this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
839 points (92.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
902 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] CameronDev@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    I think that should do it. I'll try later today and report back.

    Of course, this risks getting into an even worse state, because if the parent later tries to correctly wait for its child, the call will hang.

    Edit: Will clean up the orphan/defunct process.

    If the parent ever tried to wait, they would either get ECHILD if there are no children, or it would block until a child exited.

    Will likely cause follow on issues - reaping someone elses children is generally frowned upon :D.