this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
26 points (84.2% liked)

Canada

6961 readers
276 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ‘’ Lifestylecoming soon


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Other


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here:

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No porn.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At issue is the NATO two per cent doctrine. That calls for NATO nations to spend two per cent of their GDP on defence.

American politicians, along with retired Canadian generals and Ottawa think tanks who receive funding from the arms industry, have used that to hammer Canada as a failure on defence.

Defence Minister Bill Blair has recounted how hard it is to try to convince cabinet as well as Canadians about the need to meet the two per cent commitment because β€œnobody knows what that means.”

Add to that mix the current fiscal environment and ongoing concerns from Canadians who have been struggling financially. Directing tens of billions of tax dollars into more tanks, submarines and fighter jets isn’t a top priority among Canadian families.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (10 children)

We need to build up in case of a trump win in the US. He may well order US military action against Canada.

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Yeah, we need to remain strong in the face of the fascists who would gladly betray Canada.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

We do. And, they will if given the opportunity.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree that force is the only language fascists understand, But what would preparing Canada for a US invasion look like?

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No matter how much equipment we purchased, it wouldn't be enough. We would go down fighting. Half of the people here are so brainwashed, they'd be more likely to team up with the trump/putin alliance than defend Canada. It looks bad.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We need to build up in case of a trump win in the US. He may well order US military action against Canada.

...

No matter how much equipment we purchased, it wouldn't be enough.

So how much should we build up? Or did you mean build up international alliances?

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both. We can build up enough to fight back with allies.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We would not get state level military support from any ally. China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and Cuba might help us.

The type of build up that would be effective (if it could even be called that) against a US invasion would be sapping roads and bridges like Switzerland, and transforming our army into a resistance/insurgency force. Should we re allocate our spending towards these aims?

It seems a little premature.

Maybe we should actually invest in helping Canadians (and Americans) engage with and value democracy and human rights.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

China, Russia, North Korea are allied with rapist donald trump. If he were to order an attack on Canada, they will side with him.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They are allied with him because he weakens America. If America invaded Canada, China and Russia would probably support both sides to make America look bad.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Naa. They are with trump and he is with them.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)