this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
169 points (86.0% liked)

News

23310 readers
3603 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

They need more Bernies Sanders, AOCs... And that katie person... I forget their last name.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Katie Porter. Basically a younger Elizabeth Warren (who was taught by Warren no less).

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If Katie Porter ran, I'd 1000% take a leave of absence at work and work her campaign.

She is the progressive we need in the White House. I hope she runs in 2028.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I've said the same thing for AOC and I'll agree to do the same should Porter run.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Katie porter is such an actual king

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Katie Porter just got beat. As much as I love her I don't know why you think she'd be a strong National candidate when she couldn't win a state race.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well.... To be fair there was some shady shit with that race. But put another way, does that mean Schiff would more likely win against Trump than Porter?

But I tend to agree she's not quite ready yet.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

She lost because her party backed Schiff. The party is too heavily involved in picking winners during the party to know if a candidate could win a general.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The party did back him, all the more reason she's not going to be a viable candidate. I'd also point out that just because the party backed him doesn't negate the fact that the people voted for him.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

The people who vote for Biden will literally vote for anyone. Whether or not anyone voted for Schiff isn't that strong of an indicator for the general since voter suppression within the Democratic party is much more severe than in the general.

The party backing a candidate doesn't mean they're the best for the general, you'd think Clinton would've demonstrated that pretty clearly. In fact, party establishment picks are so anemic that they need to go out if their way to help prop up extremist GOP candidates to make their own guy look more electable. That's literally their strategy to avoid supporting populist progressive candidates, to roll the dice with fascism.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I want to think that 2024 is the battle of incumbents (ish), and that if Biden wins, 2028 will be our chance to "reset" - and get someone younger than Bernie up to the task.

If Trump wins, and Project 2025 gets its way, 2028 won't be happening.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And if Trump loses, Project 2029 will be waiting.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

oh, sure. Everywhere, vigilance is required against assholes who want to fuck others over. Be they dictators, religious nutjobs, fascists, or combinations thereof. There will always be a Project 2025 waiting in the wings, to various extents.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If Biden won in November democrats would take it as confirmation that they can keep doing their pied piper strategy, you'll end up with the exact same kind of choice. Project 2025 is not going away, so it will always be used to scare democrats into voting neoliberal corporate chosen one. There will be no reset, unfortunately.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

oh, sure. Everywhere, vigilance is required against assholes who want to fuck others over. Be they dictators, religious nutjobs, fascists, or combinations thereof. There will always be a Project 2025 waiting in the wings, to various extents.

[–] retrospectology@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, and Democrats don't want to resist Project 2025 or build a strong institutional defense against it, they want it to always and forever be an immediate danger, so they can leverage it as a threat against Americans if they don't vote for their Chosen One every election.

That's why neoliberals are complicit in the creep of fascism, they stand right up at the line and use it for political expediency but when they fail (like Clinton) it's catastrophic.