Asklemmy

44151 readers

1346 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

166

What would get you "back to the office"? (midwest.social)

submitted 1 year ago by MNByChoice@midwest.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

258 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are a lot of news articles about "back to the office", but they recirculate the same bad ideas. Let's provide some new ideas for the media to circulate. It may also have the effect of making the office less terrible.

I would like my work computer to do Windows updates lightning quick in the office. It currently takes weeks, in or out of the office. Stopping in for a day makes no difference, so there is no point. Now, if there was a point, I would go in.

What would get you in the office?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A shit-tonne more money. Like, more than the extra time spent travelling to and from work worth of salary.

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly, you are paid by the hour, so why not travel hours?

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Worked for a guy back in the early 2010s that paid for travel to the work site, was pretty rad

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That brings some weird factors into play. If I'm slightly more qualified to work a job than another candidate, but I live across town and the next best guy lives down the street, it'll be hard to justify choosing me over a factor unrelated to my performance.

Also, what if I move way into the country or the next major city over? (I live in Denver, and it's not uncommon for people to commute from Colorado Springs). If that adds 2+ hours of daily round trip commuting to my day over something that was 100% my choice, it's not really fair to the employer either. I'm not a "think about the businesses" type normally, but that is kinda BS for someone to make a decision that increases someone else's costs (or decreases their output) by 25%

[–] Daefsdeda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, there of course should be a limit. But these things take your time and time is money.