this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
472 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2125 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How stupid do you have to be to believe that only 8% of companies have seen failed AI projects? We can't manage this consistently with CRUD apps and people think that this number isn't laughable? Some companies have seen benefits during the LLM craze, but not 92% of them. 34% of companies report that generative AI specifically has been assisting with strategic decision making? What the actual fuck are you talking about?

....

I don't believe you. No one with a brain believes you, and if your board believes what you just wrote on the survey then they should fire you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tron@midwest.social 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh my god this whole post is amazing, thought I'd share my favorite excerpt:

This entire class of person is, to put it simply, abhorrent to right-thinking people. They're an embarrassment to people that are actually making advances in the field, a disgrace to people that know how to sensibly use technology to improve the world, and are also a bunch of tedious know-nothing bastards that should be thrown into Thought Leader Jail until they've learned their lesson, a prison I'm fundraising for. Every morning, a figure in a dark hood7, whose voice rasps like the etching of a tombstone, spends sixty minutes giving a TedX talk to the jailed managers about how the institution is revolutionizing corporal punishment, and then reveals that the innovation is, as it has been every day, kicking you in the stomach very hard.

Where the fuck do I donate???????

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Yeah, this one is the bomb.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] pyldriver@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right as in the actual definition of the word, no political

Conforming with or conformable to justice, law, or morality.

In accordance with fact, reason, or truth; correct.

Fitting, proper, or appropriate.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I get that, didn't think it was a political meaning. Just seems like an iffy word to me personally, hard to put my finger on it.

Maybe since the inverse would be "wrong-think"?

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not that commonly used these days (especially online?), I think the phrasing is a bit old school, but it's a totally legitimate phrase.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Fair enough, had never heard it before but that makes sense

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

English your second language? Phrases that seem common to natives may seem off to those who learned English later in life. 'Tis a silly language.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No I just suck at English apparently haha

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

No, you're correct, it's always a little suspect on usage. The kind of thing you only say when you're up on a high horse, fairly or not.