Technology

59086 readers

4493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

472

I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicity (ludic.mataroa.blog)

submitted 4 months ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

137 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How stupid do you have to be to believe that only 8% of companies have seen failed AI projects? We can't manage this consistently with CRUD apps and people think that this number isn't laughable? Some companies have seen benefits during the LLM craze, but not 92% of them. 34% of companies report that generative AI specifically has been assisting with strategic decision making? What the actual fuck are you talking about?

....

I don't believe you. No one with a brain believes you, and if your board believes what you just wrote on the survey then they should fire you.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

I've seen people defend using AI this way by comparing it to using a calculator in a math class, i.e. if the technology knows it, I don't need to.

And I feel like, for the kind of people whose grasp of technology, knowledge, and education are so juvenile that they would believe such a thing, AI isn't making them dumber. They were already dumb. What the AI does is make code they don't understand more accessible, which is to say, it's just enabling dumb people to be more dangerous while instilling them with an unearned confidence that only compounds the danger.

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 months ago

Spot on description

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

Yup. And I'm unwilling to be the QC in a coding assembly line, I want competent peers who catch things before I do.

But my point isn't that AI actively makes individuals dumber, it's making people in general dumber. I believe that to be true about a lot of technology. In the 80s, people were familiar with command-line interfaces, and jumping to some coding wasn't a huge leap, but today, people can't figure out how to do a thing unless there's an app for it. AI is just the next step along that path, soon, even traditionally competent industries will be little more than QC and nobody will remember how the sausage is made.

If they can demonstrate that they know how the sausage is made and how to inspect a sausage of packages, I'm fine with it. But if they struggle to even open the sausage package, we're going to have problems.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I honestly don't have any real issue with using it to accelerate your workflow. I think it's hit or miss how much it does, but it's probably slightly stepped up from code completion without "AI".

But if you don't understand every line of code "you" write completely, you're being grossly negligent and begging for a shitshow.