this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
250 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

58111 readers
4652 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
250
The US just invested more than $1 billion into carbon removal / The move represents a big step in the effort to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere—and slow down climate change. (archive.ph)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The US just invested more than $1 billion into carbon removal / The move represents a big step in the effort to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere—and slow down climate change.::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Carbon capture is a fucking scam, always has been.

This just funnels more money into big oil.

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. Let big oil pollute the everloving fuck of the planet.
  2. Tax the peasants to fund carbon capture theatre.
  3. Tear gas the protestors so they die quietly in their own homes.
  4. Profit???
[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Direct carbon capture is a scam. Alternatives like biochar, enhanced basalt weathering, and reforesting are definitely not.

[–] cooopsspace@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article says it's direct air capture. So everything I said about this being a scam is true.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You made a generalized statement about carbon capture, which is unfortunately absolutely a necessary step we need to take.

[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

I recall the biggest direct air capture facility ever made in like, Norway?, only being able to capture about a few seconds worth of our yearly carbon output lol