this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
110 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
3387 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Seeing Russia’s effectiveness in Ukraine the past couple of years, this really doesn’t concern me. Its capabilities are probably more like a battering ram than anything high tech. Even though that can obviously still fuck with our satellites, I highly doubt this is some doomsday weapon we should all be afraid of

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm less concerned with them being effective and more concerned they'll fuck up and kick off Kessler Syndrome

[–] muse@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

On the plus side, we might end up in a Planetes esque future where space garbageman is a lucrative job

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

this really doesn’t concern me. Its capabilities are probably more like a battering ram than anything high tech.

There has been discussion recently about Russia discussing imminent deployment of a nuclear anti-satellite weapon. I don't know if this is that, but the timing is right.

We discovered that high-altitude nuclear explosions are pretty bad news.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_Prime

Starfish Prime was a high-altitude nuclear test conducted by the United States, a joint effort of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Defense Atomic Support Agency. It was launched from Johnston Atoll on July 9, 1962, and was the largest nuclear test conducted in outer space, and one of five conducted by the US in space.

Starfish Prime caused an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) that was far larger than expected, so much larger that it drove much of the instrumentation off scale, causing great difficulty in getting accurate measurements. The Starfish Prime electromagnetic pulse also made those effects known to the public by causing electrical damage in Hawaii, about 900 miles (1,450 km) away from the detonation point, knocking out about 300 streetlights,: 5  setting off numerous burglar alarms, and damaging a telephone company microwave link. The EMP damage to the microwave link shut down telephone calls from Kauai to the other Hawaiian Islands.

The explosion released roughly 10^29 electrons into the Earth's magnetosphere. While some of the energetic beta particles followed the Earth's magnetic field and illuminated the sky, other high-energy electrons became trapped and formed radiation belts around the Earth. The added electrons increased the intensity of electrons within the natural inner Van Allen radiation belt by several orders of magnitude. There was much uncertainty and debate[by whom?] about the composition, magnitude and potential adverse effects from the trapped radiation after the detonation. The weaponeers became quite worried when three satellites in low Earth orbit were disabled. These included TRAAC and Transit 4B. The half-life of the energetic electrons was only a few days. At the time it was not known that solar and cosmic particle fluxes varied by a factor of 10, and energies could exceed 1 MeV (0.16 pJ). In the months that followed, these man-made radiation belts eventually caused six or more satellites to fail, as radiation damaged their solar arrays or electronics, including the first commercial relay communication satellite, Telstar, as well as the United Kingdom's first satellite, Ariel 1. Detectors on Telstar, TRAAC, Injun, and Ariel 1 were used to measure distribution of the radiation produced by the tests.

In 1963, it was reported that Starfish Prime had created a belt of MeV electrons. In 1968, it was reported that some Starfish electrons had remained in the atmosphere for 5 years.

Way back then, there were few satellites in orbit. There are a lot more now.

EDIT: Okay, I take it back. It looks like the development was what was being talked about, and that the deployment was explicitly not imminent:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pentagon-official-warns-russian-anti-satellite-nuclear-weapon-devastat-rcna150314

A senior Defense Department official told lawmakers Wednesday that Russia is developing an “indiscriminate” anti-satellite nuclear device that would pose a threat to all satellites operated by countries and companies around the world.

"The concept that we are concerned about is Russia developing and — if we are unable to convince them otherwise — to ultimately fly a nuclear weapon in space which will be an indiscriminate weapon” that would not distinguish among military, civilian or commercial satellites, John Plumb, the assistant secretary of defense for space policy, said at a House Armed Services subcommittee hearing.

He said the threat was “not imminent” but that the Pentagon and the “entire” Biden administration were concerned about the program.

So this is probably some other kind of "space weapon".

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Ah wow, interesting. I’m still extremely skeptical Russia pulled it off with this launch. They’re still fighting wars by throwing wave after wave of human cannon fodder towards frontlines. They’re far more rudimentary than we’ve all been told imo. Mass corruption at every level causes mass incompetence

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Are you sceptical about the part where Russia can put a satellite into orbit or the part where they can make a nuclear bomb?

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The part where they can put a a nuclear bomb on a satellite. Or that it would work even if they somehow pulled it off

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We're replying to a comment that states the US pulled it off 60 years ago

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No read that again buddy. We blew up a nuke in space. We didn't send it on a rocket attached to a satellite

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago

Do you know of some special secret law of thermodynamics that prevents us from putting a nuclear bomb in orbit?

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

During the Cold War, Russia launched quite a few nuclear powered satellites, and I mean real fission reactors, not just RTGs. Apparently they're still up there and possibly still generating power. So it's pretty much a proven fact.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They’re still fighting wars by throwing wave after wave of human cannon fodder towards frontlines.

There have been some gradual changes in the last 2 years.

Mass corruption at every level causes mass incompetence

There are still people competent, willing to win a war or with some perverted understanding of patriotism. Others steal - they make do with what they have. That's not negligible.

Also mass corruption is present not only in Russia.

They’re far more rudimentary than we’ve all been told imo.

That can also be said about Israel, for example.

I think we may find out one day that complacency plus corruption have eaten not only Russian military.

Also you are doubting that Russia has launched a few sats? It's still one of the countries with expertise and ability. Nothing weird about this.