News

I don't think that lack of availability means that the dealer doesn't want you to buy a Prius. I suspect that it's more that they want you to buy from them rather than someone else, and if they don't have Priuses available, they'll try and sell you what they do have...shrugs

For the Prius, my understanding is that during the COVID-19 pandemic, a large backlog built up at automakers due to the disruption to production. Manufacturers don't want to hugely-overbuild production capacity just to throw it away when the backlog is resolved, so the backlog persisted through 2023 and is still apparently present for some cars. According to this, this apparently includes the Prius:

https://caredge.com/guides/factory-order-wait-times-2024#Toyota_Factory_Order_Wait_Times

In 2024, most Toyota models no longer have long waitlists for an available allocation, with the exceptions being the Prius, GR86, GR Corolla, Grand Highlander Hybrid, Land Cruiser, Sienna, Supra M/T and Spec Edition TRD Pros. For these models, you can expect to wait 3-4 months for an allocation that’s not already spoken for.

The thing that @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works mentioned was something that surprised me when I discovered it too -- consumer preference has shifted from sedans to hatchbacks. But you can still get sedans...just that not all companies are making them.

GM tried killing the Bolt, a small and, cheap hatchback, and replacing it with the Equinox EV, a much more expensive SUV. They did not make any for 2024 because they were planning on ending production but we're met with tons of backlash for killing one of their most popular vehicles so they will be moving it to the Optium platform. I doubt they will lower the price of it despite them moving to Optium because it will allow cheaper production.

I get that larger vehicles offer higher margins but smaller commuter vehicles are still very necessary and wanted. The Bolt's sales figures show that pretty clearly.

The US also imposes a tariff on import of light trucks -- which I understand large vehicles like crossovers are also classified as -- due to a 1960s dispute over US chicken exports to Europe that was never resolved, making those more-profitable for domestic manufacture, since the market is less-competitive.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_tax

The Chicken Tax is a 25 percent tariff on light trucks (and originally on potato starch, dextrin, and brandy) imposed in 1964 by the United States under President Lyndon B. Johnson in response to tariffs placed by France and West Germany on importation of U.S. chicken. The period from 1961 to 1964 of tensions and negotiations surrounding the issue was known as the "Chicken War", taking place at the height of Cold War politics.

Eventually, the tariffs on potato starch, dextrin, and brandy were lifted, but since 1964 this form of protectionism has remained in place to give US domestic automakers an advantage over imported competitors. Though concern remains about its repeal, a 2003 Cato Institute study called the tariff "a policy in search of a rationale."

I suppose that if European chicken protectionism ended, American auto protectionism also might, and so would the misincentive to sell as many light trucks as possible.

Another fun quirk that I expect -- though haven't looked into -- derives from this: American towing requirements have long been much higher than those in Europe. One needs a considerably larger vehicle to tow a given trailer legally. That effectively means that if one wants to tow things in the US, one effectively needs to pay the "chicken tax" to domestic automakers.

They are indeed killing the Malibu.