this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
60 points (91.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5044 readers
664 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
60
How Many Charging Stations Would We Need to Totally Replace Gas Stations? (www.wired.com)
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
21 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Currently there are nearly 190k charging ports (public + private) and nearly 70k charging stations

If we replace all gas cars with electric, we would need about 850k more charging stations.

Currently, there are 240 more charging stations planned.

They also say many existing charging stations are poorly maintained and/or don't work.

They alsoalso say 20% of Americans report that they don't have access to consistent off street chargers for night time charging, and I am fairly confident that number is a huge underestimate.

A huge number of people live in apartments that have none, or at best a small percentage of parking stalls that are or can be set up to support EVs.

I feel that that number must only be sampling current actual EV owners (ie, basically the double or above median area income, environmentally conscious, well to do urbanite/suburbanite crowd) and not people generally, and 20% of current EV owners do not have the ability to charge overnight.

Go on zillow and look up how many apartments in any US city you can afford on the median wage of an area that support EV in their parking lot/garage.

Ok, now in for those you've found, every apartment complex like that I have ever heard of of seen offers maybe 5, 10 percent of their parking stalls as EV capable.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m not here to disagree with what you’re saying, but I do like to point out; I think the low number of planned charging stations currently planned for the next year and built over the last year is mostly due to the war between CCS and NACS. Now that NACS has won out I think we’re going to see a boost in planned stations again as they prepare to switch. We’ve just been in a holding pattern while trying to figure that whole thing out. I thought for sure CCS would win because Tesla wouldn’t want to give up their charger… oh well, we all win!

[–] BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

With more J-1772 chargers around we wouldn’t need as many CCS/NACS chargers except on highways for long-distance travel. Does NACS include Tesla Destination chargers? Genuinely not sure.

It’s not the range or speeds that’s the problem, it’s charger availability and reliability.