Technology

57997 readers

5269 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

775

ChatGPT Answers Programming Questions Incorrectly 52% of the Time: Study (gizmodo.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

202 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The research from Purdue University, first spotted by news outlet Futurism, was presented earlier this month at the Computer-Human Interaction Conference in Hawaii and looked at 517 programming questions on Stack Overflow that were then fed to ChatGPT.

“Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose,” the new study explained. “Nonetheless, our user study participants still preferred ChatGPT answers 35% of the time due to their comprehensiveness and well-articulated language style.”

Disturbingly, programmers in the study didn’t always catch the mistakes being produced by the AI chatbot.

“However, they also overlooked the misinformation in the ChatGPT answers 39% of the time,” according to the study. “This implies the need to counter misinformation in ChatGPT answers to programming questions and raise awareness of the risks associated with seemingly correct answers.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes there are mistakes, but if you direct it to the right direction, it can give you correct answers

[–] agelord@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

In my experience, if you have the necessary skills to point it at the right direction, you don't need to use it at the first place

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

it's just a convenience, not a magic wand. Sure relying on AI blindly and exclusively is a horrible idea (that lots of people peddle and quite a few suckers buy), but there's room for a supervised and careful use of AI, same as we started using google instead of manpages and (grudgingly, for the older of us) tolerated the addition of syntax highlighting and even some code completion to all but the most basic text editors.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago

AI is a tool, not a solution.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Yesterday, I wrote all of this, working javascript code https://github.com/igorlogius/gather-from-tabs/discussions/8 And I don't know a lick of javascript I know other languages but that barely was needed. I just gave it plain language instructions and reported the errors until it worked.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So we should all live alone in the woods in shacks we built for ourselves, wearing the pelts of random animals we caught and ate?
Just because I have the skills to live like a savage doesn't mean I want to. Hell, even the idea of glamping sounds awful to me.
No thanks, I will use modern technology to ease my life just as much as I can.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

That actually sounds awesome sign me up

[–] agelord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bruh, where in my comment did I tell people not to use it?

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

you don't need to use it at the first place

[–] agelord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bad reading comprehension is bad.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Drunk posting is sad.

[–] agelord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"you don't need to use it" ≠ "do not use it"

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It can, it also sometimes can't unless you ask it "could it be x answer"