this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

PC Master Race

15064 readers
3 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
_MoveSwiftly@lemmy.world
Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world
IowaMan@lemmy.world
BobaFett26@lemmy.world
The_Vampire@lemmy.world
Fudgeknuckles98@lemmy.world
CatZoomies@lemmy.world
Xeon@lemmy.ml
geosoco@kbin.social
47
Which do you prefer? A triple monitor setup? Or one single 32:9 ultrawide monitor? (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by Alpha71@lemmy.world to c/pcmasterrace@lemmy.world
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have a triple monitor setup right now, but am thinking of trying a single ultrawide monitor. What is your preference?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Turun@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago

Most games are apparently built like this. But there are two solutions: as you've said, making the UI configurable is one of them. (In KSP you can move the navball left and right on the bottom edge of the screen) Or the UI placement can be made with modern ultra wide screens in mind. W.g. the minimap is placed 40px from the right edge, unless the screen is an ultrawide one, then the UI is restructed to a box that is equivalent to a 21:9 (or 16:9) screen.