this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
108 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13051 readers
2 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
108
“Nothing” doesn’t exist. Instead, there is “quantum foam” (bigthink.com)
submitted 7 months ago by BevelGear@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skarn@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So I wonder, even if it's only appearing very briefly it's still going to exert some small gravitational effect. And who is to say the density of quantum foam is perfectly evenly distributed through the universe, within, through and between galaxies? Could this be an alternative explanation to dark matter?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So I wonder, even if it’s only appearing very briefly it’s still going to exert some small gravitational effect.

I don't think so. Remember: This is energy being converted to mass, not mass coming out of nowhere.

[–] skarn@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah right. So, an alternative to dark energy and dark mass?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

No no that's a completely different phenomenon. This is the phenomenon involved in Hawking's radiation and similar.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it mass and energy is equivalent no? And it also still baffles us as to why rest mass and resultant mass from energy should be equivalent at all?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it mass and energy is equivalent no?

Yes.

And it also still baffles us as to why rest mass and resultant mass from energy should be equivalent at all?

I don't know about this one. I'm not an expert so don't quote he on it, but I don't remember hearing this before.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Then why wouldn't it exert gravitational force?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It does, but that's the thing: It does either way. There should be no change due to the conversion of energy to mass.

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Ahh, I see what you mean. Thanks for explaining it

[–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Would be nice if we could measure quantum-foam activity depending on gravity well intensity. Let's say somewhere around Venus and Pluto to compare (sun's well).