this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
711 points (90.1% liked)

linuxmemes

20844 readers
2114 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poopsmith@lemmy.world
zephyr@lemmy.world
rtxn@lemmy.world
711
Reality check (programming.dev)
submitted 4 months ago by sus@programming.dev to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 60 points 4 months ago (3 children)

[–] sandalbucket@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

We could call it … WebAssembly! And now it’s a C compilation target, which means we can run Node.js in the browser, to get a javascript runtime :)

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that the other way around? Developing for the web in assembly is not the same as running assembly on a browser.

[–] emptiestplace@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It could be the same.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Usually when people are talking about web development in assembly they mean development back end applications.

[–] feedmecontent@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Does node have wasm support yet? Corporations have been looking for a way to stack performance degradation on the web to an arbitrary degree. The Node running on wasm running on node running on wasm running on node running on wasm running in the browser stack could get so hot.

[–] FatTony@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Why does this look so authentic?

[–] summerof69@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Web Development With Assembly

O'NO