this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
149 points (96.9% liked)

Canada

7113 readers
175 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Apparently we need even stronger controls on political donations, since it seems that purchasing politicians is pretty cheap.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

This is one of those things where I think our political class just doesn't give a shit.

The public is unhappy, but that hasn't translated into a threat at election time, so MPs and MPPs let the status quo linger. Politicians are happy to accept the donations, but would there be a different outcome if the Westons hadn't donated a few thousand dollars a year?

Having said that, I'm all for controls on donations, limits on political advertising, limits on where politicians can work after they leave office, etc.

[–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

He thought it was very effective, that you could get very high returns for relatively small amounts of money

  • Caroline Ellison's testimony on SBF

(Yes I know that's USA but our elected bums are just as easily bought)

[–] vaccinationviablowdart@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

even stronger controls

Sort of implies there are already strong controls. What are they?

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 months ago

There are limits on donation amount per contributor (I don't remember how much off the top of my head, but it isn't that high a number).