this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
59 points (74.4% liked)

PC Gaming

8028 readers
594 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The steam deck has only been out for two years. It's too soon to be thinking about successor.

I would rather have Valve follow a consistent release schedule as Valve should focus more on software improvements and features to squeeze out more potential from the original steam deck and have the third party developers target one handheld hardware baseline for every 5-7 years.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If anything, they should be focused on a new Steam machine, and with a new VR headset to accompany it.

[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Yes that would be great!

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago

Agreed. The Deck is plenty powerful for most games, and even a lot of newer releases play fine with lower graphics settings, and with the Deck's screen size and resolution, lower settings aren't noticeable in most games.

I've seen a lot of reviewers also mention that they don't notice or mind lower framerate on the Deck, either, and I agree; there's something about the form factor that makes the framerate less important.

Releasing too many SKUs will just confuse the market and lead to fragmentation. 4 years is the absolute soonest I will think higher specs might be justified.

The OLED model was a good choice; a nominal increase in performance with a fantastic display and the exact same shell dimensions. Developers don't need to target multiple devices if they're trying to make their games work on the Deck, and accessories all still work (aside from maybe screen protectors, I guess?)