423
Take-Two Interactive shuts down the Studios behind Kerbal Space Program and Rollerdrome
(www.bloomberg.com)
this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
423 points (97.7% liked)
Games
32386 readers
1110 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Was that supposed an anti paywall link or something
Seems like a broken signature hyperlink to me.
Nope, it works.
Edit: By "it works" I mean the link can be clicked on. If the formatting looks wrong, check to see if the client you are using supports subscript/superscript fonts.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
From Mbin, it looks struck through, lol
Its formatted properly, per Lemmy's web page.
Its using subscript/superscript fonts, so you might want to double-check if your client is supporting those fonts properly or not.
Subscript: ~subscript~
~subscript~Superscript: ^superscript^
^superscript^If the above does not display correctly, you need to talk to the devs of the client that you are using. I'm using the Lemmy web client.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Looks like Lemmy has decided to use a flavor of Markdown which is inconsistent from Mbin's. That's a shame.
Weirdly enough, different Lemmy Android clients for Lemmy also work differently with the scripts formatting, each having their own quirks. One person though did fix their problem by upgrading their client app to the latest version.
I had thought it was all one single standard, when first started using the formatting. My original intent was just to have a smaller font, as I was at first just using the link format without any subscripting, but people were complaining about that, so I was trying to compromise and make it smaller.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Would a link to a license on a comment will prevent someone from using your comments in a data model? I have doubts.
Nope. Its a Creative Comments license for my comment.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
For any particular reason?
He thinks it’ll actually do something.
It will not.
What is the Anti Commercial-Al license and why do people keep adding it to their comments?
“I DO NOT GRANT PERMISSION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT TO READ THIS COMMENT. ANY USE OF THIS COMMENT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR ANY REASON IS ILLEGAL. THIS COMMENT CANNOT BE USED AS EVIDENCE AGAINST ANY NON-LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONS IN RELATION TO ANY CRIME.”
I get that question asked frequently, so I’ll just point you to this comment from me, which explains. …
https://lemmy.world/comment/9744090
Otherwise, the description of the link is sufficient to get an idea of what its about.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
If most of your comments are defending the link that everyone is laughing at, and you know it doesn't do anything, you might just want to ditch it.
Probably. Nice catch
That isn't how anything works. This is like those people on Facebook posting their voodoo chainmail posts about their comments and profiles. You don't own your comments to transfer a license in the first place.
Are you a lawyer? You have some citation to back that up?
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Are YOU a lawyer?
I am an excellent shower singer.
Now, if you are done trying to avoid the question, lets try again. I'm really curious as to your citation. ...
I know that you are incorrect, but I'm willing to hear your evidence to the contrary. ??
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Fair enough. I'm getting broadsided from many people, easy to lose track, especially multi-comments later down in the stack.
But, you're still breaking rule 2.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Like I told you before. That's not a link to the license, the page itself says so!
Thats the canonical version of the license.
The legal version is linked directly from there, as well as here.
My declaring my comments as licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 means its licensed. Its your responsibility to read the full license to comply, not mine.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~
Aha, so you actually read it? Thanks for clarifying.
So you didn't reach the conclusion that this license is incompatible with posting on Lemmy?
I have. Both versions. I was just linking to the easy to read version (canonical), but by declaring my comment as licensed means it is covered by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and you can get to the legal version from the canonical version.
Are you a lawyer? No? Well then be sure to come back here once you get your degree and let us know the final word on this.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~