this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
333 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

34780 readers
222 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Interestingly, the software giant added this check since the Windows 11 24H2 will not boot without these instruction sets, according to a previous report. Though speculative, one would wonder if the company has this extra step in case someone uses bypasses to force the OS to boot with an unsupported CPU.

Why is the watermark the headline

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why is MS targeting specific hardware when windows has historically been a general purpose OS?

I’m switching my machine to Linux this weekend, even if my chip is supported, who’s to say it will stay supported for the next couple of years.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Only targeting new hardware is just a win-win-win for them.

Hardware partners love it, planned obsolescence is just new sales. Legal departments love it, constantly worse DRM. The development teams like it, less support burden. Marketing loves AI being a core feature.

They have no competition. There is no downside for them.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mac OS is a minor competitor.

[–] desconectado@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In corporate world, where I think MS makes most of the money, windows is the standard (unfortunately).

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That's why I said minor. Design companies, and plenty of website companies use Macs, but that's a small percentage of overall businesses.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 6 months ago

We're actually shifting our entire workplace. Fuck this shit - both from a hassle viewpoint and content security requirements