Technology

60087 readers

2227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

550

The Man Who Killed Google Search (www.wheresyoured.at)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/technology@lemmy.world

135 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Edward Zitron has been reading all of google's internal emails that have been released as evidence in the DOJ's antitrust case against google.

This is the story of how Google Search died, and the people responsible for killing it.

The story begins on February 5th 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google’s head of search, had a problem. Jerry Dischler, then the VP and General Manager of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkataraman, then the VP of Engineering, Search and Ads on Google properties, had called a “code yellow” for search revenue due to, and I quote, “steady weakness in the daily numbers” and a likeliness that it would end the quarter significantly behind.

HackerNews thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40133976

MetaFilter thread: https://www.metafilter.com/203456/The-core-query-softness-continues-without-mitigation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Google was so good at it for so long that we're now kinda lost.

Then either adapt or die. Move on to another search engine, host your own, use an AI LLM or go to the fucking library.

Complaining to a corporation doesn't do shit unless you affect their bottom line. And so far all these articles and message boards with losers complaining about this have done nothing to slow it down or reverse Google's trajectory.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You say that because it's clear you have no fucking clue how difficult a problem this is. This isn't something you can do overnight, and I'm not even sure a self-hosted solution is possible.

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not even sure a self-hosted solution is possible.

You say that, but it's clear you have no fucking clue how easy a solution is.

https://yacy.net/

Commercial options:

https://solr.apache.org/

https://www.meilisearch.com/

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 8 months ago

No, you just haven't thought through the implications more than a single step.

The real trick is SEO. These systems will be gamed. Google used to handle this by using its monopoly on search to enforce rules. It wasn't perfect, but it kept the worst spam from being in the top five results for the most part. Doing this self-hosted would mean a million users having to agree to do the same thing to punish spam results, and that does not work.

And then there's the problem of crawling and storing the entire web. Doing this for specific topics is doable. The entire web is not. Not for a home user with limited budget. YaCy's P2P mode might be a way around that, but it's also not really "self-hosted" anymore.

Microsoft dumped tons of money into making the second best search engine, and it's a bit of a joke. This is not an easy problem.