this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2024
302 points (94.4% liked)

linuxmemes

19733 readers
1965 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What you’re refering to as Windows, is in fact, GNU/Windows, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Windows. Windows is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another closed component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.

Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Windows”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.

There really is a Windows, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Windows is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Windows is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Windows added, or GNU/Windows. All the so-called “Windows” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Windows.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I mean... The kernel is called NT, not Windows, but okay

[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Which would make it GNU/NT…

[–] JareeZy@feddit.de 19 points 2 months ago

What did you call me?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)