this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
98 points (92.2% liked)

Privacy

31815 readers
260 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Old post is here: https://lemmy.world/post/14437575

Both OSM and Organic Maps are SEVERELY lacking in businesses. So many places aren't in the directory.

You search for fast food and only a couple pop up. Search for s fancy steakhouse by name, nothing. It shows about half of the weed dispensaries in my area...

Is there a way to update the "phonebook"?

Has shitgle been spending money trying to make all other maps unusable? It sure fuckin seems like it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemongrab@lemmy.one 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Agreed. Not FOSS though :(
Decent privacy policy.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Why do they need access to your phone, microphone, and contacts?

[–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, but as you say, they have a good privacy policy. Also their revenue model backs up their privacy policy, and I find their reasoning as to why they aren't FOSS fair:

Will Magic Earth be Open Source?

No; since it is also used commercially (we have a paid Magic Earth SDK for business partners), we cannot make the code public.

(from the FAQ)

[–] kabi@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's just saying "we want to sell access to our code, so we can't make it open source". Basically the definition of proprietary software, no?

[–] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Yes? Nobody was claiming they weren't proprietary.

[–] kabi@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

My point was that it's not so much "fair reasoning" as just a statement of that fact.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, but people were claiming they had a good reason not to be FOSS. They could have easily just not mentioned it at all but instead they name a reason that isn't an issue for many others.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

That's a weird reasoning, as I can find plenty of FOSS that has paid "business" editions