Why do you think the ones that don’t accept donations aren’t being targeted…? Because they are currently in a gray area. Once you start doing illegal actions… they get taken out.

[–] Lily9149@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

That's factually incorrect. They've gone after Dolphin whom explicitly don't accept donations. Then there's, Ryujinx, Cemu, Libretro/RetroArch, emuDeck, etc. that accept donations. This again comes down to the GPLv3 which doesn't restrict the selling of binaries of the legal code nor restrict donations. Infact if one is only accepting donations, your company by U.S. copyright law are a nonprofit.

[–] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

uhh… Dolphin uses the Wii key, that’s what they did wrong… each one has done an illegal activity that has lead to them being pursued.

Its really not a hard concept to try and grasp here, sorry.

Nothing about my previous comment is “factually” incorrect. Which specific part do you think I was wrong about, and provide a source to disclaim it if you want to try and make a point.

A lot of those apps are actual “donations” as well, not a patreon with locked emulator content…. If you can’t comprehend the differences of what’s being done, why the fuck are you discussing?

GPL has nothing to with donations… that’s what makes the emulator defense invalid for copyright, you’re only protected for personal use. Can you please stop conflating these very simple things……?

[–] Lily9149@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You have no clue how the GPLv3 works, nor U.S. Copyright law. Please stop pretending like you do.

load more comments (7 replies)