this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
280 points (99.6% liked)

Games

16403 readers
1833 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't know exactly how the fan server was implemented as I am not a developer, but I would assume that the team analyzed the calls between the master server and the client and built a server to respond like the real master server.

Also the master server doesn't actually host any games it is just a simple server that collects and distributes a list of active servers, then the client checks in with every server listed and gets more information.

As for how this applies to the current situation, I thought it was obvious... ditch the whole central gameplay server concept, go back and host a master server and let other people set up their own servers to play on.

Then the resources needed for the server the publisher needs to maintain will be minimal and when they don't want to run it further then the fans are able to build their own master server and let it run for as long as they want it.

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right. The problem is they never want this to be possible because there is mtx involved.
And presumably they don't want anyone to get anywhere near being able to mess worth that shit.
Perhaps if they made their mtx code completely isolated from the rest, it might be possible, but that would be the first time I hear of a bigass company having a clear modular isolated codebase. Would be nice though.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Monetary transactions