this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
655 points (99.7% liked)

World News

32290 readers
722 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Environmental Protection Agency approved a component of boat fuel made from discarded plastic that the agency’s own risk formula determined was so hazardous, everyone exposed to the substance continually over a lifetime would be expected to develop cancer. Current and former EPA scientists said that threat level is unheard of. It is a million times higher than what the agency usually considers acceptable for new chemicals and six times worse than the risk of lung cancer from a lifetime of smoking.

Federal law requires the EPA to conduct safety reviews before allowing new chemical products onto the market. If the agency finds that a substance causes unreasonable risk to health or the environment, the EPA is not allowed to approve it without first finding ways to reduce that risk.

But the agency did not do that in this case. Instead, the EPA decided its scientists were overstating the risks and gave Chevron the go-ahead to make the new boat fuel ingredient at its refinery in Pascagoula, Mississippi. Though the substance can poison air and contaminate water, EPA officials mandated no remedies other than requiring workers to wear gloves, records show.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 124 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (39 children)

This is the most shocking article I've read in a very long time.

Time to write or call the EPA. I have to look up how to do that. - report submitted here, you can submit one here: https://echo.epa.gov/report-environmental-violations

Literally everyone near these fuel emissions will(not can) get cancer, and 7% of people who eat fish living near these fuels get cancer. WHaT?!?

[–] Declared0978@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The salient point (emphasis mine):

Federal law requires the EPA to conduct safety reviews before allowing new chemical products onto the market. If the agency finds that a substance causes unreasonable risk to health or the environment, the EPA is not allowed to approve it without first finding ways to reduce that risk.

But the agency did not do that in this case. Instead, the EPA decided its scientists were overstating the risks and gave Chevron the go-ahead

Anyone can use Resist bot to write their representatives for free. You basically write a short letter on mobile (ios app or text "resist" to 50409 and follow the prompts), and it'll format and send it as a fax.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Might want to add that the relevant data for those chemicals the EPa says they calculated incorrectly were not released, so the only data available by the EPA indicates the insane inevitabilities of cancer that their report states.

That resist bot is super cool. I didn't know about that, thanks.

[–] BarterClub@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this. Made a easy one to sign onto. https://resist.bot/petitions/PHITGL

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I just emailed my senator

load more comments (35 replies)