this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

57997 readers
2866 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheIvoryTower@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If 14 year old me had heard I would buy a top-tier computer only to underclock it, he would have cried.

But here we are.

[–] taaz@biglemmowski.win 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There are/were two reasons why I did that:

  • board manufacturers like to push the juice into the CPU to make benchmarks look good which is dangerous with these power sucking bricks, afaik this might be already patched in recent bioses but I am not risking it/lazy to tweak back
  • depending on the CPU piece you might achieve same performance with less power which is my case, I think I have Core Voltage set to something like Adaptive-0.080 which afaik is still pretty tame and the benchmark scores almost didn't move
[–] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 5 months ago

board manufacturers like to push the juice into the CPU to make benchmarks look good which is dangerous with these power sucking bricks

I don't care about motherboard manufacturers letting you exceed Intel's limits, but I have a concern with that being the default, which it was on at least my Asus Z790 board's BIOS.