this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
671 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The malicious changes were submitted by JiaT75, one of the two main xz Utils developers with years of contributions to the project.

“Given the activity over several weeks, the committer is either directly involved or there was some quite severe compromise of their system,” an official with distributor OpenWall wrote in an advisory. “Unfortunately the latter looks like the less likely explanation, given they communicated on various lists about the ‘fixes’” provided in recent updates. Those updates and fixes can be found here, here, here, and here.

On Thursday, someone using the developer's name took to a developer site for Ubuntu to ask that the backdoored version 5.6.1 be incorporated into production versions because it fixed bugs that caused a tool known as Valgrind to malfunction.

“This could break build scripts and test pipelines that expect specific output from Valgrind in order to pass,” the person warned, from an account that was created the same day.

One of maintainers for Fedora said Friday that the same developer approached them in recent weeks to ask that Fedora 40, a beta release, incorporate one of the backdoored utility versions.

“We even worked with him to fix the valgrind issue (which it turns out now was caused by the backdoor he had added),” the Ubuntu maintainer said.

He has been part of the xz project for two years, adding all sorts of binary test files, and with this level of sophistication, we would be suspicious of even older versions of xz until proven otherwise.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spikederailed@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

dpkg --list | grep xz

should return what version of xz package is on your system. Likely 5.4, in which case you should be okay.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

It says "5.2.5-2ubuntu1." So I'll have to see about updating it.

EDIT: However, this says I should be safe: https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=416756

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The affected versions are 5.6.0 to 5.6.1

[–] knacht1@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

ii xz-utils 5.2.5-2ubuntu1 amd64 XZ-format compression utilities On my latest Mint install.

[–] spikederailed@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

which isn't an effected version, so you should be okay.