this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
1217 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
948 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1217
    That's why we need two ssds for dual boot (lemmy.world)
    submitted 7 months ago by Waffelson@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    186 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It's the usual problem: if your employer IT refuses to budge, you get locked into a Windows (or Apple) ecosystem. I had the same. My solution was to remove myself from corporate IT, and use my own device.

    I use workarounds for the interfaces with corporate:

    • MS Teams Linux client (sadly discontinued as of 2022) still works out of a jail, but the browser solution is also tested and ready as backup should I be forced
    • Webmail instead of a proper mail proram - that's a big trade-off, but I can work with it, as much as it sucks
    • Webex for conferencing (as it works properly with Firefox, contrary to many other solutions)
    • Web portals continue to work - even though sometimes I need a user agent switcher to pretend I am using chrome (fuck you @MS Teams)
    [–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I take it webmail is due to Exchange-based mail?

    The €10 I pay a year for Exquilla is worth its weight in gold. It's about the only thing on my system that's not FOSS, but I'm not even mad because it works. 9.5/10 would recommend.

    [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

    Yes that's due to Exchange. Thank you for the pointer to Exquilla - I'd gladly be willing to pay for that out of my own pocket, but there's three problems:

    • closed source plugin, which I don't want on my machine if I can avoid it
    • convincing my company to expose EWS (unless OWA uses the same interface, which I doubt?)
    • Microsoft seems to plan decommissioning of EWS:

    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/exchange-team-blog/retirement-of-exchange-web-services-in-exchange-online/ba-p/3924440

    Quote:

    Today, we are announcing that on October 1, 2026, we will start blocking EWS requests from non-Microsoft apps to Exchange Online.

    [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    There's mail apps for Linux. I think thunderbird is most popular.

    [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    My point was about corporate IT refusing to provide a mail server to the outside world.

    [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    So no IMAP/POP3 server or what do you mean? If so how does the web app work?

    [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Webapp probably uses Exchange services internally and exposes only a web interface to the internet

    [–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

    Ah, I suppose that makes sense.

    [–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

    In the end, web front-ends always allow to expose selected parts of any kind of internal (potentially insecure) protocols to the internet through a demilitarized zone that only allows https protocol.

    It's like being allowed to watch the data you are interested in through a glass window, but no touching :)