this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
377 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

59086 readers
3431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
377
Redditors Vent and Complain When People Mock Their "AI Art" (futurism.com)
submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
253 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, just pass a law saying you're not allowed to use a model that was trained using non public domain material.

Voila, AI can be permitted without robbing existing artists and artists still have a monopoly on new material.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Um, good luck trying to get that law passed.