this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
978 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58315 readers
4477 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
978
US sues Apple for illegal monopoly over smartphones (www.theverge.com)
submitted 6 months ago by sverit@feddit.de to c/technology@lemmy.world
258 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The US Department of Justice and 16 state and district attorneys general accused Apple of operating an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market in a new antitrust lawsuit. The DOJ and states are accusing Apple of driving up prices for consumers and developers at the expense of making users more reliant on its iPhones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] horsey@lemm.ee -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’ve wondered that in the past when people say Apple has a monopoly - there seems to be choice in the market. One can function fine with an Android phone. But people have said “they have a monopoly on iPhones” which doesn’t make much sense to me. Of course they do, but that’s not the same as a monopoly on mobile phones. Also having a monopoly isn’t illegal, only abusing it is. It’s not legal to have a successful proprietary product?

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I’ve wondered that in the past

Well, now you have your answers here in all detail, but it seems you didn't read them.

[–] horsey@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I didn't say I was wondering now. I said I was wondering in the past. In any event, i expect to find out from the court case, not online comments from people who probably lack expertise in antitrust law and are not attorneys.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I also wonder the same, and wish you’d point to those answers, but I think that’s what this whole thing is : a day in court to establish those answers