this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
765 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9653 readers
433 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I love living in a car free city. I can't believe America doesn't build more cities like mine.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)
[–] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 37 points 5 months ago

Exactly, no one drives in New York City also, who wanna drive in that traffic?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Huh, weird that when I was there, there were literally thousands of cars. Probably just hallucinated it

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s not really what car free means.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

For years I've somehow missed this. Cars driving on nearly every street and somehow that "car-free", yeah makes perfect sense.

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think it's because the bar is so low, just the ability to choose to walk for everyday commuting, errands, and leisure qualifies as car free. Ie, you can choose to be car free if you want.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh. So you mean the places where you have to be rich to live at a nice place, while everyone else has to live in a tiny apartment in a huge building that's been borderline uninhabitable since the 1970's?

[–] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Yes and that's the problem. Walkable areas are currently mostly only affordable for the rich (mainly in the US that is, other countries seem to have no problem designing both rich and poor areas to be walkable). If we built more places to be walkable, less affluent areas might be able to enjoy the benefits as well.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I don't understand that at all. I thought car free meant a place, usually a part of town, where cars are not allowed. Those places exist. So to call places nothing like that "car free" seems pretty useless imo

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In general usage it means 'the ability to get by with the usual needs of life without needing a car'.

At least as far as I understand it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I suspect you're referring to the use of the term when applied to a person. It makes much more sense to me to say "I'm car free" even if I own a car if I don't drive it regularly. I mean, still not accurate, but makes more sense.

[–] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

I'm referring to how folks use it on social media. 'car free city' very very rarely would mean banning cars from a city.

I'm not saying it is the correct term. At all.

'walkable cities' makes more sense to me.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

I guess that's one way to understand that word.

Colloquially it is used to refer to the capability of a place that allows its inhabitants to live car free.

Completely banning cars is rarely a demand because it makes no sense. A car is not a problem, hundreds of them are. Especially if they are used and required for everyday mundane tasks.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The only city that I know of that fits that definition is Venice, Italy. I've been able to live car free in SF for 10 years.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

I would make every city Macinac Island if I could, minus the horses.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago

SF and Oakland aren't car-free, they are car outsourced. You don't drive, you have someone drive you. Other then a very narrow stretch of Down Town SF to Oakland, most of that metro area isn't served by public transit. Unlike say NYC where most of the metro area IS served by public transit. (It's still not car free though.)

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What, I had no idea it was car free! That's awesome!

[–] RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

That's ridiculous. SF is not car free at all!

[–] Elmerfuddz@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So do you still utilize Uber or driving services? If so you’re still dependent.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I've used taxis a handful of times over the past 10 years. Mostly for surgery related things.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lots of cyclists get hit by cars in SF. How is that possible if it's car free?

[–] matengor@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

I can't tell if this is sarcasm or not.