this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
680 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
4174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One of the most convincing points is ...

competition has had many years to acquire Reddit prior to this IPO and have chosen not too. Acquiring Reddit now wouldn’t create all that much value for a competing social platform.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I sure as hell wouldn't acquire a company for a product that has a near identical, free, open-source alternative that's in active use.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Well, at least one person thought it was a good idea to acquire a Mastodon competitor, and they paid a pretty penny for it

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

0.1% of the users isn't exactly a threat to their model.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just like Reddit wasn't a threat to Digg.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The scale is immensely and massively different. Modern social media is not going away, the digg phenomena was one driven by a much smaller number of more passionate users.

That much smaller number of more passionate users has already left Reddit.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Compare to Lemmy's userbase, which is anti-capitalist and clearly has a bone to pick with reddit. If I had to value Lemmy it would be for the cost of hardware and operations alone.

Which is kinda what Reddit should be valued at, because its a community oriented site, the value is never in the contributions. You can't guarantee their engagement. They can always pack up and leave. Anyone thinking there's a value in community oriented sites is being fooled.

I know people are gonna think "daaaamn, you just shit over lemmy too" but Lemmy makes no illusion of it, its a community funded effort, so the product offering is going to be suited to its audience, and this helps engagement. Reddit has no greater objective than tricking advertisers that people will visit.

[–] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I absolutely would, for the users. But only if the userbase wasn't full of Nazis and pedophiles, so reddit is still a no for me.