Technology

59086 readers

3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Jensen Huang says even free AI chips from his competitors can't beat Nvidia's GPUs (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 7 months ago by 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 46 points 7 months ago (14 children)

I'm free to choose any laptop I want for work. This means, that for me, the GPU and other processors are free. It turns out that I still avoid Nvidia like the plague. I don't care if it is free, if the drivers are horrible.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 9 points 7 months ago (10 children)

And AMD or Intel are better? Everyone complains about the drivers.

[–] snaggen@programming.dev 39 points 7 months ago (2 children)

For Linux it is a huge difference. AMD and Intel have great open source drivers, while Nvidia have binary drivers with a lot of issues.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I find this strange, because I had nothing but trouble getting my R9 390 working with any Linux distro, but my RTX 3060 hasn't given me a single issue on like 6 different distros.

[–] GarlicToast@programming.dev 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are you talking about a laptop or a desktop? If desktop, using offload or something like that?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Desktop, both Intel and AMD builds. And no, I just had multiple SSDs that I played with distros on.

[–] GarlicToast@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nvidia works flawlessly most of the time on desktops. The suckyness of their drivers shows its ugly head mostly on laptops.

And it's bad, crash your computer bad some times.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I guess I've been lucky with my laptop, although it is fairly old at this point.

[–] GarlicToast@programming.dev 1 points 7 months ago

Three laptops ago it mostly worked with FOSS solutions around the driver. Nvidia mostly killed them, and intreduced their own unstable solution. As far as I care, if they won't fix it before my hardware dies, the next laptop will have a GPU by another manufacture.

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And for AI at home? Since this is a story about AI DataCenters

I want to get an AMD but the integration of Nvidia GPUs for processing ML/AI stuff is much higher. So if I want to mess with running AI at home I only have 1 choice.

I hope AMD release something that competes on that front, and can still play games on the weekend, but currently, he is right there is no competition

[–] Fisch@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I run AI stuff just fine on my AMD GPU using HIP. At least LLMs and Stable Diffusion work perfectly fine but that's the only things I've tested.

[–] PersonalDevKit@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

All the benchmarks put the equivalent Nvidia cards almost 2x more in Stable Diffusion https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/stable-diffusion-benchmarks

I hope that is an old benchmark and times have changed, but I can't find anything like it that is more recent.

For a bit of my soul I get a lot more ai power.

AI works on AMD but the speed doesn't seem to be anywhere near Nvidia.

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments (10 replies)