this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
1411 points (92.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20742 readers
1133 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 54 points 6 months ago (10 children)

You'd normally use a software raid implementation these days, and Linux has a number of those. But yeah, dual booting can expose some quirks and filesystems and disk setup in general is one of the most prominent.

[–] NathanUp@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago (8 children)

This. How an advanced use case is accomplished is not a point against a system's usability.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 18 points 6 months ago (7 children)

The point I was trying to make is that if you ever want to do something that is not covered with an out of the box install, it's typically far harder to do in Linux than in Windows (although my ~15 years as a windows sysadmin probably bias my opinion)

Windows is turning into a telemetry nightmare because about 10 years ago Microsoft figured out that they could sell ad space and monetize user data, so I'm trying to get off the platform before my LTSC install hits EOL. But I have to admit it's a hard path.

[–] PM_me_your_doggo@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

But in your example raid controller driver was covered in an out of the box install in windows. If it wasn't you'll still need to do pretty much the same. Also there was a couple of weird steps in your linux list like switching DE to run a couple of CLI commands and disabling AHCI for some reason.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)