Technology

34437 readers

180 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

The Revenge of the Hot Water Bottle (solar.lowtechmagazine.com)

submitted 2 years ago by tomasz@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So.. I really don't know chemistry, and these aren't the highest quality references, but here goes:

4 mol of iron in a heat pack provides 1648.4 kJ of heat. ^[1]^
4 mol of iron weighs 223g. ^[2]^
Recycling 1000kg of steel saves 642 kWh of energy. ^[3]^
- Recycling 0.223kg steel saves 642 * 0.223 / 1000 = ~ 0.143 kWh
- 0.143 * 3600 = 515 kJ

Huh. So maybe heat packs are a reasonable use of scrap iron's embodied energy after all. Assuming you have a sufficient source of uncontaminated steel filing waste and that it's economical to collect and process into heat packs.

...But only if you're heating your water using fossil fuels using an inefficient method! If your water is heated using solar or waste heat capture or a heat pump^[4]^, which would swing the balance way over to hot water bottles again.