this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
1514 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60106 readers
1985 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did your Roku TV decide to strong arm you into giving up your rights or lose your FULLY FUNCTIONING WORKING TV? Because mine did.

It doesn't matter if you only use it as a dumb panel for an Apple TV, Fire stick, or just to play your gaming console. You either agree or get bent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

This is what I like to call "bullying". I don't think anyone should be able to hire private lawyers. All lawyers, no matter how rich you are or if you're a corporation, should be public and randomly assigned dictated by a random number generator and a publicly viewable algorithm IMO.

The US has the right to a fair and speedy trial in its constitution. Current litigation is niether.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The only argument i have gotten against this is "But what if I get a shitty lawyer? I should be able to pay what I want for the quality of lawyer I desire."

It doesn't seem like a strong argument to me but to those who use it as a reply it seems rock solid?

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The other route that could work is public civil defenders. It requires the government to properly fund and staff, but having a legal firm sponsored by the state willing and ready to take up cases would mean that the private entities can still get their lawyers but they can't steam roll over someone that doesn't make $500k a year.

Of course, there could be corruption issues. I wouldn't want the lawyer on my case being drinking buds with the lawyer on the opposing side.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is a good compromise but frankly I think all lawyers should be government employees assigned by the court with 3rd party independent oversight.

Its not perfect but it is better than 'if you are rich you will likely win or just drive your opposition into poverty'.

[–] kofe@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't you request a new lawyer if you feel yours isn't representing you well? Or appeal based on that?

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I never said they were MY arguments