this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
219 points (94.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36169 readers
470 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably fine if you are the janitor. If you are the engineer in charge of maximising "effectiveness" of weaponry well....

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I'm going to disagree on that one. Anything to do that helps enabling it is morally wrong.

[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Paying taxes? Most of that goes to military spending in the US

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Yes that is "morally wrong" as well. The difference is that you don't have a choice.

Moral wrongs become less wrong the less of a choice you have to make them.

Stealing is bad, but I have no problem with a starving person that steals.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works -5 points 9 months ago

That's factually not true.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Ethics is our most pressing modern dilemma. What if the janitor and his two kids he raises alone are about to get kicked out of their flat unless he finds a new job, and he's been looking for 4 months and it's the only offer he got?

[–] d0ct0r0nline@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Or I'll even take it a different direction. Say the janitor is single, lives a minimalistic lifestyle, and gives money to anti-war causes or politicians actively trying to regulate these weapons.

Can we quantify morality? Is there enough of an ethical net gain here to absolve them?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But that's not how most janitorial contracts work. You work for a company and then are contracted to clean. You don't have a say with who owns the building. For the most part anyways.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Most of these defense contractors are pretty big and I'd assume a person would need special clearance to access them. If a person has no other choice to feed their family then it would be morally acceptable, but if they can avoid it then they should.