this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
150 points (95.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43124 readers
1235 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Utah County the cheapest "House" for sale is 600 square feet, 2 bed, 1 bath, at $300k.

So at current interest rate it would be $1,800 a month mortgage(assuming you put the 60k down payment! A decent amount more if you do 3% down.)

The cheapest condo/town in utah valley is 205k, 1,100 square feet, on a 400 square foot lot. But due to a $500 HOA fee the monthly cost is still 1,700 a month (assuming 20% down).

With 3.5% down they'd both be closer to 2.1k +PIMI.

So yeah, how is where you live doing?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (7 children)

The cheapest home I could find in my hometown of Vancouver, BC is:

1 bedroom, 1 bath, 696 sq/feet 398,000

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

Just to point out, everyone else is talking about detached single family homes. The person from Vancouver gave a tiny apartment and it’s still worth nearly half a million.

The cheapest detached home for sale is $1,350,000, and it’s about as far away from downtown you can get while still being in the city of Vancouver.

Vancouver’s housing is out of control.

[–] bobbyfiend@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Has that "absentee owner" law (or whatever the name is) taken effect yet? Do you think it will help?

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Nothing will help unless they ban the ability to own multiple properties. Policies such as the empty homes one have intentional loopholes

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The current government is trying to add things fairly quickly, the absentee owner law is in effect, and they did just add another 20% 'flipper' tax. As mentioned though, people still own way too many houses. My current landlord owns 7.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

To add to this, they’re banning mass AirBNB rentals which should help. But yes, banning ownership of more than 2 properties would surely help most.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)