this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
108 points (94.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43380 readers
2103 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There are many cultures around the world that are suppressed by majoritarianism. They have to face challenges like forced assimilation, language discrimination and refusal to acknowledgement of their unique identity. In fact, many cultures have been identified by UNESCO, that will soon cease to exist - either that they're vulnerable, or completely extinct. How do you, as a minority, feel, knowing that your entire identity will cease to exist in a few decades? Do you have a sense of camaraderie towards other minorities from other parts of the world, say, the Ainu people, or the Brahui pastoralist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Evkob@lemmy.ca 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Francophones are not prioritized for employment or political opportunities. Do you know which linguistic group is prioritized for such roles?

Bilinguals.

Do you think a unilingual French speaker would have more opportunities in Canada than a unilingual English speaker?

Of course, people whose first language is French have much higher rates of bilingualism than people whose first language is English, for a myriad of reasons. But I find it illuminating that for all the whining I see from (some) Anglophones about "lack of opportunities because they don't speak French", their proposed solutions always focus on stripping Francophones of their rights instead of encouraging French language education for Anglophones. Many countries around the world have huge percentages of their population being able to speak two (or more!) languages, why shouldn't we strive for that? I see no downsides to increased bilingualism.

I live in New Brunswick, the only officially bilingual province in the Canada, where our unilingual Anglophone premier repeats the same talking points you do about how difficult it is for unilingual Anglophones to advance themselves in our province. All while holding the highest elected title in the province without speaking a lick of French.

[โ€“] someguy3@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

.... Yes bilinguals *in French and English. I thought that was so obvious that I didn't say it specifically. And that requires, wait for it, French.

[*Actually no, not bilinguals. If you are bilingual in English and Mandarin, you don't meet the French criteria. Repeat all languages. It's French that they want and require above all others. But you're trying to misframe the issue by saying not Francophones unilingual, and saying bilingual (with what I see as you defaulting to include French).]

So you speak French and work in Quebec. Fine. Why do I need French to get a good job in the prairies? Do you see how this goes? The demand for English is market demand because it's the dominate language in Canada, the US, UK, and dare I say the international language of business and science. The vast majority of demand for French in Canada (outside of Quebec) is an artificial construct forced on the rest of the country. It's completely artificial. There's no natural demand or desire. But it's forced on everyone and on to job requirements. You're trying to confuse it with all these other things trying to make it sound like 'both sides'.