this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
139 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37622 readers
502 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 56 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (25 children)

Haven't read the article, but I am going to say it's a bad alloy combined with salt in the air, salt on the roads combined with galvanic corrosion. I'll edit my post after I read this....

Edit: It's the deadly chromium layer not being wrapped in a $5000 clear coat.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 21 points 7 months ago (9 children)

They didn't do a clear coat like everything else ever made lol.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

That was musks selling point for production, he said by skipping the paint booth they saved X amount of time, materials and money by going with plain untreated stainless

[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They could have saved even more by not putting batteries in them, or motors... Man, these things coulda had a way bigger profit margin!

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 7 months ago

Say you're only running off 100 of them and charge $1,000,000. They'll all be sold. Ferrari perfected this business model long ago.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)