this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
749 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60079 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] n3m37h@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but the article didn't mention any redeeming values for the device as you did

This means the writer has a bias of negativity towards the device and now you are arguing that's it's a good thing it is being banned.

You would vote to ban dihydrogen monoxide if you found it has been consumed by every murderer in existence and also has been found at every school shooting too

[โ€“] BossDj@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I said "this is a dumbfuck response to a problem they allege to be fixing and hopefully their committee concludes the same".

Translation = it's stupid to ban it.

I was giving credit to that other guy for listing some redeeming qualities of the device as the article did not.