Technology

60106 readers

1923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

675

Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature (www.engadget.com)

submitted 10 months ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NoRodent@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

By they way, I just found out that they removed the button, but typing cache:www.example.com into Google still redirects you to the cached version (if it exists). But who knows for how long. And there's the question whether they'll continue to cache new pages.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

they've broken / ignored every modifier besides site: in the last few years, god knows how long that'll work

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Quotes are fucking awful now. You have to change the search terms to verbatim now which takes way fucking longer. Google has enshittified almost everything. I'm just waiting for them to ruin Maps.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago

Remember when Google Now was intelligently selected data and not an endless scroll of paywalled news articles?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

I hope they only kill the announced feature but keep the cache part.
Just today I had to use it because some random rss aggregator website had the search result I wanted but redirected me somewhere completely different...

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago

My guess is that a cached page is just a byproduct when the page is indexed by the crawler. The need a local copy to parse text, links etc. and see the difference to the previous page.