Technology

60106 readers

1967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

675

Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature (www.engadget.com)

submitted 10 months ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pastaPersona@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In a shocking turn of events, google decided once again to make their namesake service worse for everyone.

Legitimately baffling, keeping this feature doesn’t really seem like it would impact anyone except those that use it, while removing it not only impacts those people that already use it, but those who would potentially have reason to in the future.

Cannot think of a single benefit to removing a feature like this.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 19 points 10 months ago

It is only baffling if you still think that Google's aim is to help people. At one point they were trying to gain market share and so that was true. It is not anymore.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

ostensibly it takes a lot of space to cache that much data, but seeing as they own youtube this should be nothing in comparison

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

i would guess they have it cached still anyways.