this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
1053 points (95.3% liked)

Work Reform

9717 readers
208 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What older folk often forget is that not only could they easily afford a house in the 60s and 70s, but they likely also could on a single income. Many people nowadays are having trouble affording a house on dual incomes.

Housing keeps going up and couples are now having to split them with other couples just to raise a family. My sister and her fiance live in the basement of a house where his brother and sister-in-law live upstairs with a toddler and twins on the way. They won't have enough room soon and can't afford anything larger, and my sister wants to start having kids soon but the basement isn't exactly larger either.

That's one house for 4 working adults and potentially 4 children, when back in the day you could have a full house with 2 adults and 3-4 children on a single income.

My grandpa worked as a landscaper/gardener and was still able to support his stay-at-home wife and 3 children.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

As a fifty year old I would like to point out that I did not officially reach legal age (18) until the 1990's. I am "older". Who you mean are what we colloquially refer to as "old as fuck".

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You made me do maths that did NOT yield pleasant results, if you're 50 you must've been born in like 1945 and I won't hear any different!

[–] Dlayknee@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

As someone in my early 40s, I can confirm that 50 year olds were born almost 100 years ago. Right? ...right??