270
Cities: Skylines 2 developers have noticed 'a growing tendency of toxicity in our community'
(www.techradar.com)
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
270 points (93.3% liked)
Games
32938 readers
913 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The comments in here are really disappointing and a reflection of where this community has gone in general.
Excusing toxic gamer communities, accusing the developer of things for pointing it out? All because the game not in a good state is toxic in itself and really not what this community should be.
This place gets worse every week.
Toxic devs get a toxic community. Why should I express sympathy for them experiencing consequences?
How were the devs behaving toxic? I mean, should be easy enough to provide quotes, right?
Remember when they launched the game in a shit state and charged full price for it, then failed to communicate? Actions speak louder than words, and those are some pretty toxic actions.
That's not toxic, though. I get that those actions are annoying and really poor, but they're not... toxic. As in, they aren't done with the intention of poisoning the relationship, in fact quite the opposite, they're meant to exploit it to take money out of it. Hence "exploitative" might be a much better term to use.
But importantly, being exploited is no reason to be toxic to workers who don't make the decisions in return. Especially not in a situation where there are ample ways to go about just undoing the damage done to you, namely refunding the game then putting the company on ignore on whatever stores you frequent.
I repeat, for the last time, I've never advocated for toxicity or harassment to workers. Only to the companies they represent. Please, if you're going to argue with me, argue based on what I say, not what you decide I mean.
Are these not your words? I get that you aren't advocating toxicity to workers, but you are defending it.
Devs clearly refers to the company that develops the game. Try again.
The fact that you're harping on this point is because you know I don't agree with personal harassment. You are aware that I don't agree with people being abusive about specific people who work for the company. You're making bad faith arguments to try to prove "You were saying this", which I was not, and if I was, is clearly not what I intended. Move on.
You were repeatedly stating things not supported by facts or events. And how I read your dev statement was completely reasonable.
I think that's where many people got that impression.
I'm not really the person who needs to know when to quit.
Argue based on what you said, and not some invented/imaginary version of what you said?
This is the internet, sir. Such factual discourse is greatly frowned upon! /s
Failure to communicate.
They've had regular updates to their blog since before and well after the release. It's a recent blog post that led to people hoping the toxicity could chill a little.
So far I'm seeing implications but haven't been able to find facts to support. Where are you seeing dishonesty or shadiness?