this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
110 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44152 readers
742 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
110
Deleted (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IsThisLemmyOpen@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
 

Deleted

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

How would you design a test that only a human can pass, but a bot cannot?

Very simple.

In every area of the world, there are one or more volunteers depending on population / 100 sq km. When someone wants to sign up, they knock on this person's door and shakes their hand. The volunteer approves the sign-up as human. For disabled folks, a subset of volunteers will go to them to do this. In extremely remote area, various individual workarounds can be applied.

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dick pics and tit pics. Bots do not have dicks and tits.

Gives new meaning to Tits or GTFO

[–] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

There'll be AI art for that.

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

I can't help but think of the opposite problem. Imagine if a site completely made of bots manages to invite one human and encourages them to invite more humans (via doorstep handshakes or otherwise). Results would be interesting.

[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This has some similarities to the invite-tree method that lobste.rs uses. You have to convince another, existing user that you're human to join. If a bot invites lots of other bots it's easy to tree-ban them all, if a human is repeatedly fallible you can remove their invite privileges, but you still get bots in when they trick humans (lobsters isn't handshakes-at-doorstep level by any margin).

I convinced another user to invite me over IRC. That's probably the worst medium for convincing someone that you're human, but hey, humanity through obscurity :)

[–] Zamboniman@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I convinced another user to invite me over IRC. That’s probably the worst medium for convincing someone that you’re human

Hahah, I'll say!

That's exactly what a bot would say, bake him away toys!

[–] help@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

This would tie in nicely to existing library systems. As a plus, if your account ever gets stolen or if you're old and don't understand this whole technology thing, you can talk to a real person. Like the concept of web of trust.