this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
36 points (95.0% liked)

Canada

7299 readers
1062 users here now

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Regular, reliable rail makes sense. It's much cheaper to build, cheaper to maintain and the rolling stock is cheaper too. There's also the energy demand, it increases in proportion to the square of velocity. HSR is just too expensive for the limited benefits.

Almost all of the wear on our roads is from truck traffic, with one maxxed out tractor trailer equaling the wear caused by roughly 10,000 personal vehicles. HSR does nothing to alleviate that.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Rail has to be competitive with cars to maintain and encourage ridership. High speed rail can offer significantly faster travel times than cars.

The time to build regular reliable rail was decades ago, we should strive to build more modern technology that will serve us longer into the future and encourage people to switch from driving by being faster. HSR can still be reliable so long as maintaince is properly funded.