Privacy

31258 readers

693 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

-3

ProtonMail Complied with 5,957 Data Requests in 2022 - Still Secure and Private? (restoreprivacy.com)

submitted 8 months ago by Napain@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

they scrubed there no ip logs policy years ago

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DARbarian@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago (3 children)

What are they supposed to do as an internationally known and used company? Reject legal proceedings and ignore official national laws?

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the answer to that is clearly they should structure their service to store the absolute least possible personal information needed to allow the service to function so that when a legitimate law enforcement agency comes knocking they can honestly say they don't have much.

Which... appears to be pretty much what they do.

I agree with you. Losing the protection of a right -- even one as fundamental as privacy -- is by definition not a violation so long as that happens through due process. Now we can certainly talk a lot about what level of process is due, and I'm sure it will be basically unanimous that current standards around the world are FAR too accommodating to law enforcement, but at least in principle a warrant justifies the invasion of privacy. That's what the warrant is for.

This story kind of makes me want to switch all my stuff to ProtonMail.

[–] DARbarian@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I would agree with you that given the service they provide (email is brutal), they couldn't really collect any less info or improve security/privacy much more.

[–] Napain@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

they could not log the ips

[+] crandlecan@mander.xyz -8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Change their advertising

[–] fluckx@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And what advertising is that precisely? No data ( emails, passwords, drive files ) were shared with the authorities. So the data is still secure and private.

As far as I can tell they haven't falsely advertised.

I'd give them bonus points for transparency ( publishing how many court ordered subpoenas they receive on a yearly basis ) compared to other companies that don't.

Other companies which are prominent in the privacy/secure email scene face similar issues.

E.g.: https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2021/03/enough-is-enough-what-happens-when-law-enforcement-bends-laws-to-access-data/

I think you're mixing up anonymity with privacy. It can definitely be more anonymous, but you would need to take steps for that yourself ( Tor, VPN, ... ).

[–] DARbarian@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

How though? They advertsize themselves as the privacy-conscious Google alternative which they very much are. Idk if I've just not been exposed to (their) ads, but do they make all kinds of unreasonable claims like being outside of all legal jurisdiction?