this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
1073 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

60070 readers
3523 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everyone can agree on VLC being the best video player, right? Game developers can agree on it too, since it is a great utility for playing multimedia in games, and/or have a video player included. However, disaster struck; Unity has now banned VLC from the Unity Store, seemingly due to it being under the LGPL license which is a "Violation of section 5.10.4 of the Provider agreement." This is a contridiction however. According to Martin Finkel in the linked article, "Unity itself, both the Editor and the runtime (which means your shipped game) is already using LGPL dependencies! Unity is built on libraries such as Lame, libiconv, libwebsockets and websockify.js (at least)." Unity is swiftly coming to it's demise.

Edit: link to Videolan Blog Post: https://mfkl.github.io/2024/01/10/unity-double-oss-standards.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

I think the discussion below your comment is good, but your comment, and the community response (in the form of comment votes), illustrates a problem I have with the lemmy community.

Counter arguments are important.

It seems Lemmy has an even bigger problem than Reddit did with circle jerks. Any counter argument that goes against the grain is immediately pounced on here. Especially if you don't write a page long disclaimer that you don't necessarily agree with the decision, I'm one of you, etc.

I simply pointed out that <hated company> may have had a good reason to consider <3rd party plugin> a big enough legal liability to triage out of their store for the time being, based on some half remembered related knowledge of murky legal details of the past.

You immediately implied that I'm some sort of corporate shill, even if it was politely worded. And the community piled on in response.

It would be nice if there was at least an attempt to understand both sides of an argument here.

[–] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

But what about all those highly voted articles about how OTHER social media sites are dangerous echo chambers!

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago