this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
283 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

34819 readers
52 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml
283
Whoopsies! "Free speech absolutist" "accidentally" suspends the accounts of journalists who are critical of him, and people whose political views he disagrees with. (aus.social)
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by ajsadauskas@aus.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml
29 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Whoopsies! "Free speech absolutist" "accidentally" suspends the accounts of journalists who are critical of him, and people whose political views he disagrees with.

He seems to have quite the habit of firing or banning people he disagrees with, doesn't he?

Via Gizmodo:

"X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, purged an unknown number of prominent accounts over the last 24 hours with little to no explanation, and then restored the accounts minutes after this article was published.

"The list includes popular accounts belonging to journalists, writers, and podcasters. Among them are Ken Klippenstein of the Intercept, writer and podcaster Rob Rousseau, Texas Observer correspondent Steven Monacelli, the account for TrueAnon, a left-wing politics and news podcast, and a number of others.

"One thing the accounts have in common is recent criticisms of the Israeli government.

...

"Musk, who calls himself a “free speech absolutist” has previously said no one should be banned from X unless they break the law.

"Update, 1:12 p.m.: Shortly after this article was published, Musk responded to a question about the issue from far-right influencer Jackson Hinkle. Musk promised to investigate, and the accounts went back up soon after. Musk later blamed the “mistake” on X’s spam algorithms. The Hamas account is still suspended."

Source: https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-x-twitter-journalists-banning-spree-1851151593

#Musk #ElonMusk #Twitter #X #FreeSpech #Tech #Technology @technology

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Not sure what this has to do with technology.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm tired of Musk stuff too, but the community rules does seems to allow it to certain degree:

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 10 months ago

The community rules need to change.

A shitty tech owner being a shitty person isn't newsworthy in the first place.

But this community is just as bad as /r/technology about being a Musk news feed.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How the fuck did you used to use Twitter then? Smoke signals?

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

I just took a shit. Plumbing is a technology so maybe I'll make a post about it here.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 2 points 10 months ago

Just because something is hosted by technology doesn't mean it's about technology.

And article about Candy Crush's financial statements wouldn't be about technology either.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

being generous, this is post about whether the personal vissitudes of a CEO or a recalcitrant spam detector are to blame - the latter is technology the former is relevant if it's being blamed on the latter.

[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How about option 3: Musk's success relies heavily on remaining visible in the media, so he does and says stupid shit to keep us talking about him and his companies. And we're being absolute morons and doing exactly what he wants.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, Musk is an annoying slime ball with a ton of money thanks to mommy and daddy. But thanks to good PR in the past there are a lot of people that worship the ground he walks on, so we need to keep his stupidity visible in the media so that number doesn’t grow.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago

Or, you could just let him fade into obscurity, which for him is a fate worse than death.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Respectfully, that would be covered by "visscitudes."