this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
578 points (97.7% liked)

memes

10163 readers
2433 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thantik@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (4 children)

When you download an image and it's a WEBP......

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Why is that a problem? Unless you use outdated software any app should open it just fine.

As an example, on my computer I have 2 (3 if you count WMP) apps for opening photos and 2 for editing ones:

  • Default Windows Photos App - Opens WEBP

  • Honeyview - Opens WEBP

  • Windows Media Player - Opens WEBP files, but I guess this is an obscure way to view pictures.

  • Built-in MSPaint - Opens WEBP, but doesn't save them

  • paint.net - Opens WEBP and saves them

And of course web browsers open them as well just fine.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

Website forms when you're adding a file: WebP? What the fuck is that?

[–] AccountableMenace@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I remember once I was making a presentation using Google slides, I wanted to add an image when it told me that "webp format is not supported". Webp... Made by google... In google slides...

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's the internet standard. Anything but that is going to take long to load.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] force@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

why, it's an objectively better format. unless you're on windows xp i guess

one could argue "but a few things don't support it" but that's always going to be a problem with innovation

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

[citation needed]

PNGs are not that big, dude

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well webm was build for the web and png not.

It would of been nice to have Jpeg XL but that didn't happen.

[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Dosen't PNG stand for Portable Network Graphic?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Maybe? I just know that webm images load faster and are smaller.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Do you have any actual data for that or did you just read it on a blog about webdev and take it at face value?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Kind of both, I read about it and I know that WordPress and other CMS will convert images to webm.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 9 months ago

That's not data though. Do you have numbers saying webps load faster?

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago
[–] danielf@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Can someone please tell me why everyone hates on WebP? It's supported by basically everything, has better compression, supports both lossy and lossless compression, and supports an alpha channel. It's basically a trade-off between PNG/JPEG for compatibility and JPEG-XL for features and compression.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lots of services online don't support webp uploads, plenty of programs still don't recognize webp, etc.

[–] danielf@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Ah. Guess I've just been lucky.